It has now been over a month using Gnome 2.24 after changing from KDE 4.1.2. During this time I gave KDE 4.1.2 another go. After some updates were release performance improved; but general KDE 4′s interface is slow and sluggish and errors are constant. Its doesn’t handle GTK apps well when rendering on the screen; the screen goes black or blank in parts until it refreshes.
Also KDE 4.1.2 is limited to what sort of hardware it can run on. Not as bad as Vista but looks like it will not support anything over five years old with little ram. I am unable to run on my old laptop. Dell Latitude C610. It is just freezes up the system. Takes forever to catch up with processes.
So ultimately I think the KDE 4 desktop will improve and will be great for current and future hardware. I am hoping the experience will get better and the desktop become a lot more stable.
I’m keeping an eye on Gnome 3 development and looking forward to where it heads.
So as I said in a previous post its Gnome for me for now. It is just more stable and can handle the tasks I have with ease and very few crashes.
Stability before innovation.
This Blog reminds me the reason I like bloging so much, the interaction is very important with readers and you guys have it right. Looks great too, will be back for more posts, David the mover.
Told you it was rubbish
It’s not very moist either.
The errors outweigh the avarage scale by 10%, which in turn heavily increases the KDE’s chance of an obesity label…
Thanks for this post… I have old hardware and it is difficult to find info on memory requirements for Gnome 2.24 vs. KDE 4.1. I think I will take your recommendation, thanks.